US housing starts · United States · 1 month ahead
2026-08: the model assigns an 80 percent probability to 1,159 to 1,404 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate
Point estimate 1,269 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate from Holt (exponential smoothing with additive trend), against 1,239 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate observed in 2026-07. holt beats last_value on out-of-sample MAE by 16.0 percent over 47 cutoffs (minimum 24, margin 5 percent).
Fan chart
- Quantiles
- p5 1,133 · p10 1,159 · p25 1,207 · p50 1,276 · p75 1,333 · p90 1,404 · p95 1,431
- Source
- empirical quantiles of 36 in-window 1-step residuals, in log space; no normality assumed
Immutable fields
- Key
- us-housing-starts:USA:1
- Id
- 4ca65e9b-f418-4e47-931e-faa048eddf01
- Created
- 2026-09-07 22:16 UTC
- Data cutoff
- 2026-09-07 22:16 UTC
- Origin
- 2026-07 = 1,239 (obs 169883)
- Target period
- 2026-08 (31 days)
- Point
- 1,269 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate
- Interval
- 1,159 to 1,404 at 80 percent
- Model
- holt models_v1.targets_v1
- Baseline
- last_value
- Snapshot
- b2be1d13853627fcc11dacefcfa916232180aff3345c8d9e4a1712b7d7d07a5b
- Data mode
- ingested_at
- Status
- active
Statistical association, not causal
Holt (exponential smoothing with additive trend) uses only the target's own history; there are no driver contributions.
Not yet realised
The observation for 2026-08 has not been ingested. The weekly forecast.evaluate job attaches it when it arrives; the record above does not change.
What the forecast takes for granted
- No structural break in us-housing-starts between the data cutoff and the target period.
- The source keeps publishing the series on the same definition; a rebasing or redefinition invalidates the comparison.
- The smoothed level and trend at the cutoff persist over the horizon.
What would show this forecast wrong
- If the first published value of us-housing-starts (USA) for 2026-08 is below 1,159 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate or above 1,404 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate, the 80 percent interval is falsified.
- The model assigns a 10 percent probability to a value below 1,159 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate and a 10 percent probability to a value above 1,404 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate; interval misses should occur about one time in five over many forecasts, and a run of misses well above that rate falsifies the calibration.
- The point forecast is above the last observed value (1,239 thousands of units, seasonally adjusted annual rate); a realised value at or below that level falsifies the direction call.
Scorecard for this target and horizon
| Model | Status | Cutoffs | MAE | RMSE | Direction | 80% coverage | Skill vs last value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holt (exponential smoothing with additive trend) models_v1.targets_v1 | champion | 47 | 79.79 | 103.9 | 74% | 74% | 16.0% |
| Drift models_v1.targets_v1 | challenger | 47 | 94.99 | 118.9 | 53% | 74% | -0.0% |
| Last value models_v1.targets_v1 | baseline | 47 | 94.96 | 118.9 | 0% | 74% | 0.0% |
| Linear trend models_v1.targets_v1 | challenger | 47 | 102.7 | 134.1 | 66% | 74% | -8.2% |
| Ridge regression on lags and drivers models_v1.targets_v1 | challenger | 47 | 93.44 | 117.8 | 53% | 74% | 1.6% |
| Seasonal naive models_v1.targets_v1 | challenger | 47 | 128.6 | 170.1 | 62% | 79% | -35.5% |
Holt (exponential smoothing with additive trend)
Holt (exponential smoothing with additive trend)
Purpose. Point and 80 percent interval forecasts of us-housing-starts (USA) 1, 3, 6, 12 months ahead. Owner: Forecast Lab (HV 3.0).
Method
Simple exponential smoothing with an additive trend. Level and trend smoothing parameters (alpha 0.7, beta 0.05) are chosen by grid search on one-step-ahead squared error inside the training window. The series is modelled in natural logarithms and transformed back, so intervals are asymmetric in level terms.
Uncertainty
Intervals are empirical: the model is refitted at earlier origins inside the training window, the realised errors at the same horizon are collected, and the interval is the 10th to 90th percentile of those errors around the point forecast. No normality is assumed.
Training and evaluation
Training window: 811 periods, 1959-01-01 to 2026-07-01. Evaluation: rolling-origin backtest over 47 cutoffs using pseudo real-time data (the earliest ingested value per period; no vintage archive exists for this series, so revisions between the cutoff and today are not reproduced).
Known limitations
- Structural breaks after the cutoff are not modelled.
- Driver contributions are statistical associations, not causal effects.
- Promotion to champion requires beating the last-value baseline on out-of-sample MAE by at least 5 percent over the minimum number of cutoffs; otherwise the baseline stays champion.
- Retraining: every scheduled forecast.run refits on the data then available; backtests re-run from /admin/forecasts.
Supersedes
This is the first record for its key.